![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
mondai wrote: people who share my dream
mondai wrote: some jobs are even requiring PHDs (pretty much the same level for getting a uni job back home!).
honesty wrote:mondai wrote: some jobs are even requiring PHDs (pretty much the same level for getting a uni job back home!).
Unless these are jobs that are chiefly in research and have a small (say, 6 hours per week) teaching/supervision element, then they are not like the university jobs at home that require PhDs, and which come with the promise of tenure.
It's ridiculous, like recruiting medical doctors to be nurses.
Oriental Chairboy wrote: I think the success of any given EFL professional will increasingly depend on his or her ability to contribute as much to the commercial well-being of a given institution
what might doing that consist in? Attracting (fee-paying) students? Writing papers that attract research funding to the institution? But that second is "academic contribution"...
do you think a masters in TEFOL/linguistics guarantees somebody a job at a university?
It also depends on location, Hokkaido has gone tits up. If you want an ok job up here you need the Phd, aside from one, two or (three, and we tell you to fvck off after) jobs. As much as I love living here, I can see myself moving in the next 2 years.
misc. wrote:do you think a masters in TEFOL/linguistics guarantees somebody a job at a university? what else is necessary? (aside from some teaching experience)
genkigirl1 wrote:I've been saying this for years. I think the jig is up with regards to not having... qualifications! Unless you want to work at a crappy eikaiwa for the resat of your life. I think the Japanese may finally have clued into the "punks on a lark" thing. Sadly though, they still treat the qualified folks like crap - re your comment about PhDs and not tenure. Getting worse in some cases, better in other. Depends on the university.
Hideyoshilives wrote:I think the implosion of Nova really raised the sleazy profile of the eikaiwa industry. Throw in the bad economy and I think there's just less money to go around for the average punk on a lark. It used to be that the unqualified teachers could make a living on a Nova salary, but it's becoming increasingly harder to do that. Even if the salary isn't so bad, I don't think they keep teachers around as long anymore. The genki dipshit teaching circuit is not a stable industry anymore.
kagekatsu wrote:Hideyoshilives wrote:I think the implosion of Nova really raised the sleazy profile of the eikaiwa industry. Throw in the bad economy and I think there's just less money to go around for the average punk on a lark. It used to be that the unqualified teachers could make a living on a Nova salary, but it's becoming increasingly harder to do that. Even if the salary isn't so bad, I don't think they keep teachers around as long anymore. The genki dipshit teaching circuit is not a stable industry anymore.
Another trend to watch is the growing market for Chinese lessons. Up to now it hasn't had much impact on eikaiwa demand but it's not hard to see how that could gradually change in coming years.
genkigirl1 wrote:misc. wrote:do you think a masters in TEFOL/linguistics guarantees somebody a job at a university? what else is necessary? (aside from some teaching experience)
Nope. Doesn't mean much if you don't have someone to vouch for you - I came to a city not knowing anyone but had a friend who was a pretty "big" guy with some of the top gaijin guys in the uni scene. A quick email made sure my resume was at the top as these guys trust this guy's judgment. I also had to have published papers, uni teaching experience (again, I had that because of a friend hiring me for a quick course), decent Japanese (they don't want to have to babysit you and for one school I had to have a resume done in Japanese) and sit through one panel interview for one PT job and meet the top gaijin for one and the top Japanese for another. So you need an MA, publishing, connections, Japanese, sometimes uni experience and all the other things for job interviews.
But this is just my experience. I am sure someone on here will disagree or claim something else but this seems to be the norm for most folks. Once you are "in" the system you are pretty safe though I have a coworker who has a Japanese MA and he's losing classes at places because they are hiring more folks who just got their MA rather than a non-related degree.
ETA - Hokkaido and Kansai are notorious for being hard to get into.
mondai wrote:2nd largest land mass in Japan with only 3% of the population. The climate is more like England than Japan with no rainy season and no need for aircon. Also there are none of the annoying snakes or bugs that the rest of Japan has. Hokkaido also has some world class ski resorts and some great onsens. The food is not bad either. It's the youngest prefecture which means that it's much less traditional and so you get a lot less of the BS of other areas in Japan.
mondai wrote:2nd largest land mass in Japan with only 3% of the population. The climate is more like England than Japan with no rainy season and no need for aircon. Also there are none of the annoying snakes or bugs that the rest of Japan has. Hokkaido also has some world class ski resorts and some great onsens. The food is not bad either. It's the youngest prefecture which means that it's much less traditional and so you get a lot less of the BS of other areas in Japan.
Atalante wrote:I really wonder what person with a phD or outstanding qualifications would accept such crap jobs? The pay ain't worth it, and neither are the benefits, I can't imagine who's so qualified to be so desperate to take these crap jobs.
Surely the market will have to recorrect itself again in time?
Atalante wrote:I really wonder what person with a phD or outstanding qualifications would accept such crap jobs? The pay ain't worth it, and neither are the benefits, I can't imagine who's so qualified to be so desperate to take these crap jobs.
Surely the market will have to recorrect itself again in time?
Jexebel wrote:Misc, getting paper and presentation credit is the easiest part. Just keep an eye out on calls for papers or presentations and put together something that's borderline useful and you'll not just be published but also remembered more fondly than the asshat after you that's rehashing another useless study. The bar is set pretty low out here. Pick something you're interested in and just give it a shot.
ShinNS wrote:gg1, which is harder do you think, the foot in the door or moving up the ladder from the foot-in-the-door type position?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], ihateanpanman, privileged and 8 guests